The question of terminology restrictions enacted during the Trump administration, particularly within governmental agencies, is a matter of public record. This often involved directives to avoid specific terms in official documents, presentations, and communications. For example, reports indicated that certain agencies were discouraged from using phrases like “climate change” or “evidence-based” in their work.
Restrictions on vocabulary use have significant implications for how policies are formulated, communicated, and understood. Such limitations can affect scientific research, data collection, and public discourse. Historically, controlling language has been a method of influencing public perception and shaping policy agendas. The impact can extend to resource allocation and prioritization within governmental departments.
